{"created":"2023-06-19T08:17:03.269119+00:00","id":105,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"cf005e09-5b3e-46da-925d-4a2ff906cb9a"},"_deposit":{"created_by":14,"id":"105","owners":[14],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"105"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:dcu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000105","sets":["2:23"]},"author_link":["407","408"],"item_10002_biblio_info_30":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2003-03-25","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"34","bibliographicPageStart":"21","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"5","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"人間福祉研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"The human welfare review","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_28":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"憲法25条は「健康で文化的な最低限度の生活を営む権利」としての生存権を保障しており,この規定が福祉国家としてのわが国の法的基礎をなしている。しかし,この生存権の法的性質をどのようにとらえるかという問題については,これまでも争いのあるところであり,とりわけ最高裁の一連の判決においては事実上,生存権の権利性は希薄化しているといってよい。生存権の司法的実現という視点からは,いずれの学説および判例上も,問題は立法・行政裁量の効果的な統制と,適切な司法審査基準の構築と適用にかかっていることを指摘した。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_full_name_26":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"408","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Takano, Toshiki"}]}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"高野, 敏樹"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"407","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2013-03-23"}],"displaytype":"simple","filename":"KJ00000053905.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_11","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"本文（PDF）","url":"https://dcu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/105/files/KJ00000053905.pdf"},"version_id":"99ed95d3-73ed-4434-82b8-e6eb73a67304"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"憲法25条","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"生存権","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"健康で文化的な最低限度の生活をいとなむ権利","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"国の積極的作為義務","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"プログラム規定","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"立法裁量","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"行政裁量","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"裁量統制","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"25条の分離解釈論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"生存権訴訟","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"違憲(司法)審査の基準","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"生存権の保障と憲法25条の規範性","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"生存権の保障と憲法25条の規範性"},{"subitem_title":"Guaranty of the Right to Maintain the Minimum Standards of Wholesome and Cultured Living and the Legal Effects of Art.25 of the Constitutional Law","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"14","path":["23"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2013-02-20"},"publish_date":"2013-02-20","publish_status":"0","recid":"105","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["生存権の保障と憲法25条の規範性"],"weko_creator_id":"14","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-19T08:33:35.823843+00:00"}